Published On:
Posted by Unknown
Micromax Canvas Turbo- Short Review
After the success of Canvas 4 MIcromax were eager to launch out canvas Turbo. It is the only Micromax's Full HD Display. The Indian SuperGiant is backing the campaign with the return of Canvas Turbo with a high level marketing with Hollywood Actor Hugh Jackman. to make sure it doesnot go unnoticed. There is a Question that will Turbo bw able to compete with Tech Gaints Apple and Samsung that have overtaken most of the market leaving the other unnoticed.
Design /Build
Micromax Canvas turbo looks like random Android smartphones. But when we get closer we notice that we'd seen same design on Canvas Doodle 2, The companies other big screen smartphones. The construction of the Turbo is better than that of previous versions like Canvas 4 and Canvas HD and also feels even more compact. It is available in MIdnight Blue and Pristine White colour variants. The front of Turbo posseses a 5-inch full HD- Display three captative touch for navigation below, front camers, ear piece, notification LED and Sensor array just above it.The back of Turbo is replaced by non removeable Aluminium Cover which is supported by two plastic strips. The Top strip also contains the 13 MP camera Lens with a big LED Flash.
Display
It comes mwith a full 5 inch HD CGS( Continuous Grain Silicon) IPS Display with 1080*1920 pixels resolutoin density of 440 ppi. Due to its Full HD display it has been creating a good impact form the buyers and sellers too.It displays text and images crisp and sharp but its drawback is that the buyers are not so impressed with display colour reproduction, especially black colour and beside this its brightness level is also dull compared to Full HD Display cells like Gionee Elife E6.Despite being Full HD Display it dissappoints.
Price: Rs. 19,990
Pros
Great build quality
Decent performance
Cons
Underwhelming display
Camera performance could be better
Ratings (Out of 5)
Value for Money: 3
Camera: 2.5
Overall: 3.0
Price: Rs. 19,990
Pros
Great build quality
Decent performance
Cons
Underwhelming display
Camera performance could be better
Ratings (Out of 5)
Value for Money: 3
Camera: 2.5
Overall: 3.0
Design: 3.5
Display: 3.0
Performance: 3.0
Software: 3.5
Battery Life: 3.5
Display: 3.0
Performance: 3.0
Software: 3.5
Battery Life: 3.5
